Plato theory of forms Essay

Plato was a ascribablellist and thus believed that there are two conceptions the sensible world and the world of ideas/Forms. The world of ideas or Forms is the true reality and the world of appearances is just reflections of world of Forms. Plato believed that our knowledge of the Forms was a priori which means that our souls knew the Forms before it was inwardly us, therefore we have knowledge prior to experiencing the objects with our senses.Plato believes everyone is born with an intuitive further frail understanding of the Forms. He also believes the philosopher is able, through using his intellect, to carry out true knowledge of the abstract Forms without using his senses. Platos theory of Forms rear end be seen as unconvincing to almost who believe that abstract ideas e. g table, horse, beauty are actu eachy names that have been invented to help people describe their experiences of the physical world.This is a materialistic view as it suggests that objects in this w orld are the real reality and our ideas can develop ground on experience of things. Aristotle agrees with this and believes knowledge is gained through experience and that there is not an eternal World of Forms that is a priori to us. However, in Platos defence some believe that each variety of a Form shares a proportion for example each horse is slightly different yet they all share something that makes it resemble a horse.According to Bertrand Russell, Platos theory make a very important advance in philosophy, since it is the first to accent the problem of universals. Platos theory is often regarded as unconvincing due to the fact that Plato believes that every object and idea in the world of appearances is an imperfect copy of an image or Form in the World of Forms. This suggests that there is a perfect Form of things such as a movie theater ticket, mud or an insect and so on. According to Bertrand Russell, his ideas of the Forms when taken to its extreme.